Marietta Square is not big enough for two Locals, or so it would seem.

Restaurateurs GG and Salem Rose announced earlier this year that they would open a new restaurant, Local on North, in July at the site of the old Christmas Shoppe, which closed in 2017.

But the similarity of “Local on North” to that of the neighboring “The Marietta Local” restaurant has delayed the proposed eatery’s opening.

“Plans are that a restaurant will be open late September in the 113 N Square address, not sure about the name until our lawsuit with the ‘Marietta Local’ over the use of word ‘local’ is settled,” the Roses said.

The issue between the two restaurants began when the Marietta Local, a popular spot for breakfast and lunch just on the other side of the Square, filed for a restraining order prohibiting Local on North from using that name.

A Cobb Superior Court ruling this spring from Senior Judge Adele Grubbs granted The Marietta Local the temporary restraining order against GG and Salem Rose, the owners of Local on North, which has locations in Canton, Roswell and Duluth that go by the same name.

The order prohibits the Roses from using the terms “the local” or “local” to refer to their intended Marietta restaurant in any way.

“The existence of a second restaurant named ‘Local’ so close to the existing restaurant called ‘Local’ causes confusion and damage to the Local, LLC (The Marietta Local); and because of the immediate publicity does damage to the Plaintiff for which there is no adequate remedy at law,” Grubbs wrote.

Grubbs’ order came just one day after the March 28 filing on behalf of Marietta Local owner Jim Tidwell Jr., in which Marietta attorney Dan Wirth sought the restraining order in an effort to protect the restaurant that opened in 2014.

“The Marietta Local is not seeking damages or to prohibit Defendants from opening a restaurant. It is merely seeking the limited relief afforded to it under the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act,” Wirth wrote in the filing, adding that the existing restaurant “stands to lose significant customer goodwill and suffer irreparable harm to its business relationships with customers” if the incoming restaurant were to open with its intended name.

“Defendants merely need to choose a new name,” Wirth added.

The filing claims that from March 14, when The Marietta Local learned about the incoming restaurant, and in the two weeks prior to the filing, about 75 customers questioned or commented to Tidwell regarding the incoming restaurant. It also claims that Local on North serves “similar food to The Marietta Local, creating a strong likelihood of confusion.”

But in their legal responses, the Roses state that they do not intend to open a restaurant “specifically called ‘The Local North on Marietta Square.’” The incoming restaurant, the filings add, would have a name consistent with its brand, “The Local on North,” and would not use the words “Marietta” or “Square” to advertise or market the establishment.

“This venture is not intended to harass or cause confusion with the Plaintiff, The Marietta Local,” state the filings submitted by attorney Douglas H. Flint of the Canton-based law firm Flint, Connolly & Walker on behalf of the Roses.

Flint’s filings go on to claim “the term ‘Local’ is a generic name that does not have any specific relation to the foods and services” provided by The Marietta Local, and dispute The Marietta Local’s claim to a proper trade name of “The Local.”

Further arguments on behalf of Local on North dispute the two restaurants’ similarities. The Marietta Local, it points out, “is a breakfast and lunch eatery, closing at 2 p.m. every day” and “sells biscuits, fried chicken, and other Southern foods in a traditional kitchen atmosphere.”


Naming issues regarding The Marietta Local seemingly go back several years.

In September 2013, the Marietta Daily Journal reported on the plans for a daytime eatery called “The Local” in the former location of Tommy’s Sandwich Shop, which closed in March of that year.

The Local held a soft opening in February 2014, serving about 150 meals, with Tidwell calling the opening day a chance for customers to try the menu and “put pressure on the kitchen.”

But in April 2015, in the MDJ’s coverage of Taste of Marietta the restaurant was referred to as “The Marietta Local.”

When asked by the MDJ on Thursday when the restaurant changed its name, Tidwell said it had been sometime before the April 2015 article.

“It was before that. I changed it immediately,” Tidwell said, but when pressed on the circumstances of the name change, he answered, “I don’t know that there were any,” and declined further comment, citing the legal dispute regarding the name.

A third business on the Square with a similar moniker, The Local Exchange, which is described as a modern-day general store, is not involved in the naming rights feud.

Follow Jon Gargis on Twitter at

Recommended for you

(1) comment


After checking out their website, they need to be more worried about it. says its canton, but you can only click on other cities. Odd

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.